The Harsh Truth in the Filipino Curriculum

The Harsh Truth in the Philippine Curriculum In the Philippine society at present I cannot help plainly obtain that when it comes to intellectual stuff the English language is more commonly utilise than the native language. James Syrians one of the students of Atone noticed this and he steady made an clause about it which enraged many people. In my view James Garrisons Article has a point, its looks negative at first but it actually has a good meaning. But he problem is that well-nigh Filipinos are too stubborn to accept the truth.When he said that the Filipino language is commonly roled in the streets I agree because you wouldnt use the English language in the local street stores or when traffic with local vendors because it would look awkward. One of the probable reasons why his article has received many negative criticisms is because in some parts of the article he used his own perspective based on the environment he grew up in especially hen he said that the Filipino language is not used on intellectual.But ironically the school Atone(his school) uses the Filipino language for intellectual arguments. Since James Garrisons articles presents the problem that the Filipino language has today it would be good if the Depend would check this article and come up with something to help flourish the Filipino Language. I would suggest that they modify the program wherein they would use the Filipino language in teaching some major(ip) objects like Math and Science during grade 1-6 so that the students would understand it better.Because during those geezerhood the students havent even mastered their mother tongue and it would be better to allow them carry it well first before teaching them the English language. The article of James Syrians may look very offensive for a Filipino at first but if we read between the lines we can learn a thing or two about the state of the Filipino language in the current curriculum.