'Why Some Governments Are More Willing Than Others To Help Tackle Climate Change:\r'

'Climate transplant is the substantial change in the earth’s mood during a period of 30 years. Some organisations whitethorn be more unforced than others to ease tractor trailer modality due to advantages and disadvantages for their countries.Some governments whitethorn not check over to rig mode change as it could affect their economy. An display case of this argon NCI’s, for example China. China is behind the mass end product of many products therefore their snow emissions ar very high. Tackling humour change may not be in the fill of China as it could mean a negative affect on the countries harvest-tide and industrialisation. This may be why most governments may be more unforced than others to help tackle humor.Developing countries may too be reluctant in tackling climate change as they may turn over that it is the responsibility of MEDCs as they atomic number 18 the integrity’s who emit the most carbon dioxide. They may believe that as they atomic number 18 not the one’s change highly to climate change they should not invest money into tackling it. This money could be used for things such(prenominal) as food, wearable and medicine which they may believe atomic number 18 more important than helping the climate. why should developing countries have to suffer for the modify MEDCs are doing just to live gold lives. This is why developing countries may be reluctant to tackle climate change.Some countries such as Norway are more allow foring to tackle climate change. This is because they believe it is in their people’s fill to tackle climate change as preventing climate change now will retrace a commodious beneficial strike in the long term. â€Å"Norway, UK, U.S. Allocate $280 trillion to Stop Deforestation”. Norway has already started expend money to tackle climate change, this because of compress from the people in Norway, to avoid engagement the government has seen it is in the ir best evoke to listen to their people and invest money in stopping climate change. This may be why some governments may be more uncoerced than others to help tackle climate.Some LEDCs may neediness to tackle climate change as it will be very beneficial in the future. This relates to countries such as the Maldives and Bangladesh. Both countries are low laying countries and if the impacts of climate change keeps getting worse than both countries are at risk of be of being underwater due to the gigantic ontogenesis in sea level rise. By tackling climate change they are victorious away this risk. besides it is in the interest of other countries to help them as losing a lot of grime due to implosion therapy will mean loss of huge amounts of space.Bangladesh is densely populated if it were to lose its land; the people would need to move to other countries taking over their land and space, eventually increasing their chance of natural disasters. Also Maldives is a country where the government want set an example, to show what it is like to be carbon neutral. Therefore by tackling climate change now they could start a whole new revolution having a very positive impact on the world.Countries such as the Philippines will be very eager to start tackling climate change now, especially because of recent events. The government has seen the consequences of not taking action during hurricane Hyan; where huge scales of damage occurred. If the Philippines had tackled climate change earlier they may have been able to write many lives. Therefore countries such as the Philippines may be more willing than other to tackle climate change.\r\n'